Author: Karsten Silz
Dec 7, 2021   |  updated Jan 7, 2022 6 min read

Permalink: https://betterprojectsfaster.com/guide/java-full-stack-index-2021-12-fe-mobile/

Java Full-Stack Index December 2021: Front-End Mobile


This is an old version! Click below for the current one.

See Current Version


Summary

  • Don’t build two separate applications with Apple’s and Google’s first-party frameworks. Use a cross-platform framework instead.
  • If you already use Flutter or React Native in your project, then keep using them. Otherwise, evaluate a migration. In many (most?) cases, such a migration doesn’t make business sense.
  • If you start a new project or do migrate and have used React before, then start with React Native first and use Flutter otherwise.
  • If you start a new project or do migrate and have not used React, then start with Flutter first and use React Native otherwise.


Table Of Contents



Archive

Java Full-Stack Index November 2021: Front-End Mobile


Applications

These recommendations are for building native enterprise applications on iOS and Android - forms, data grids, reports. They are not for games or media applications.


Choices

Here are the choices in alphabetical order:


State of the Art

Declarative UIs are state of the art. Learn about it here.


Popularity

Why Popularity - and How?

Picking a popular technology makes our developer life easier: Easier to learn, easier to build, debug & deploy, easier to hire, and easier to convince teammates & bosses. Popularity can make a difference in two situations: When multiple technologies score the same, you could go for the most popular one. And when a technology is very unpopular, we may not use it.

Now I look at technology popularity as a funnel from interest to learning, application, and finally to skill:

The technology popularity funnel
The technology popularity funnel
  • Quantity decreases in the funnel - we’re interested in many technologies, but few end up on our resumes.
  • Time increases in the funnel - it takes many months, often years, for technology to move from “interest” to “skill”.

We’re interested in the trend of the ratio between competing technologies. So we use Google searches to measure interest, Udemy course buyers to measure learning, Stack Overflow questions to measure learning & application, and mentions in Indeed job ads to measure skills.


Google Searches

Google Trends demonstrates the initial interest in a technology over time. “More searches = better” to me.

Google Trends for Flutter, JavaFX, React Native, and Xamarin
Google Trends for Flutter, JavaFX, React Native, and Xamarin

Flutter wins, React Native is second, Xamarin third, and JavaFX fourth. Both Flutter and React Native are growing, but Flutter’s growth is stronger. JavaFX and Xamarin have declined for 5 years now. This link produces the chart above.


Students at Udemy

Udemy is one of the biggest online learning sites. They publish the number of courses and the number of students (if it goes beyond a certain threshold). This shows how many people evaluate a technology. I compare the number of students from my first measurements in March vs. the number at the end of November, with React Native as the baseline.

Students at Udemy for Flutter and React Native
Students at Udemy for Flutter and React Native

Flutter wins, React Native is second, Xamarin third, and JavaFX fourth. Flutter is pulling away from the pack while Xamarin decreases and JavaFX grows slightly.

Here are the links that show the courses for all and the number of students for some:


Questions at Stack Overflow

Stack Overflow Trends shows which percentage of questions at Stack Overflow has a particular technology tag. It is a proxy for using a technology during evaluation and productive use. “More questions = better” to me.

Questions at Stack Overflow for Flutter, JavaFX, React Native, and Xamarin
Questions at Stack Overflow for Flutter, JavaFX, React Native, and Xamarin

Flutter wins, React Native is second. Flutter grows much stronger than React Native; both have declined in recent months. JavaFX and Xamarin have declined for 4-5 years. This link produces the chart above.


Job Ads at Indeed

The Indeed job search is active in 63 countries representing 92% of the worldwide GDP in 2020. It demonstrates the willingness of organizations to pay for a technology - the strongest indicator of popularity in my mind. I compare mentions in job ads from August against measurements from November. This time, Flutter is the baseline.

Job ad mentions at Indeed for Flutter and React Native
Job ad mentions at Indeed for Flutter and React Native

React Native wins, Flutters is second, Xamarin third, and JavaFX last. Flutter closed the gap to React Native a bit, which declined slightly in absolute numbers. Xamarin lost mentions while JavaFX dropped so much that this may be an error on my side.

Please see here for details, caveats, and adjustments of the job ad mentions.

You can find the detailed search results with links here. They include breakdowns by continents:


Analysis

I use the following criteria to recommend one of the two choices - Flutter and React Native:

  • Java: Flutter wins here because its language Dart is very similar to Java. React Native uses JavaScript instead.
  • Declarative: Declarative is state-of-the-art for front-end development. It’s a draw because both frameworks work this way.
  • Safe: Google has the image of killing projects and has multiple competing front-end frameworks. Although I personally think that Flutter will be around, good luck convincing your teammates or your boss! That’s why React Native is my winner here.
  • Popular: Flutter leads in three of the four popularity indicators but crucially loses in jobs - globally, there are twice as many for React Native. That’s why I declare React Native to be more popular.
  • Mobile functionality: It’s a draw as both frameworks can build the kind of applications we need.
  • Libraries: I don’t know which of these two frameworks has the most and best libraries.
  • Speed: Flutter is faster because it has a native render engine. In React Native, rendering has to pass a JavaScript bridge.
  • Native Functionality: Flutter is the winner here: It has a lot of plug-ins that provide easy access to native functionality (like the camera or pictures), can show native screens, has channels for publish-and-subscribe communication with native code, and has a C API to top it all off.
  • 1 Codebase: It’s a draw because both have one.
  • Build, Deploy & Debug: I don’t know which of these two frameworks has the shortest build & deploy cycle and the best debug experience.

Based on these criteria and my ratings, Flutters is the winner, React Native is second. That’s why my recommendation is:

  • If you already use Flutter or React Native in your project, then keep using them.
  • If you use another framework, then investigate migration to Flutter first, then React Native. In many (most?) cases, such a migration doesn’t make business sense.
  • If you start a new project and have used React for building web applications, then start with React Native first and Flutter otherwise.
  • If you start a new project and have not used React, then start with Flutter first and React Native otherwise.

comments powered by Disqus